Difference between revisions of "Talk:Single-Seaters"

From LFS Manual
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
I re-odered the single seater cars list to put the FBM first. Seems better that way? I don't know how to change the template at the bottom of the page to match, though. Also, shouldn't the MRT5 be in here rather than unclassified? It's a single seater alright, and it's a "Formula" (Formula SAE), it only lacks downforce which is not reason to exclude it IMO. Thoughts? - Bob
+
I re-odered the single seater cars list to put the FBM first. Seems better that way? I don't know how to change the template at the bottom of the page to match, though. Also, shouldn't the MRT5 be in here rather than unclassified? It's a single seater alright, and it's a "Formula" (Formula SAE), it only lacks downforce which is not reason to exclude it IMO. Thoughts?
 +
 
 +
Edit: Especially since it's already considered a Formula here: http://en.lfsmanual.net/wiki/Cars#Car_Classes - we need some consistency here. :) - Bob

Revision as of 14:02, 18 January 2008

I re-odered the single seater cars list to put the FBM first. Seems better that way? I don't know how to change the template at the bottom of the page to match, though. Also, shouldn't the MRT5 be in here rather than unclassified? It's a single seater alright, and it's a "Formula" (Formula SAE), it only lacks downforce which is not reason to exclude it IMO. Thoughts?

Edit: Especially since it's already considered a Formula here: http://en.lfsmanual.net/wiki/Cars#Car_Classes - we need some consistency here. :) - Bob