Difference between revisions of "Talk:Single-Seaters"
From LFS Manual
Jump to navigationJump to search| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | I re-odered the single seater cars list to put the FBM first. Seems better that way? I don't know how to change the template at the bottom of the page to match, though. Also, shouldn't the MRT5 be in here rather than unclassified? It's a single seater alright, and it's a "Formula" (Formula SAE), it only lacks downforce which is not reason to exclude it IMO. Thoughts? - Bob | + | I re-odered the single seater cars list to put the FBM first. Seems better that way? I don't know how to change the template at the bottom of the page to match, though. Also, shouldn't the MRT5 be in here rather than unclassified? It's a single seater alright, and it's a "Formula" (Formula SAE), it only lacks downforce which is not reason to exclude it IMO. Thoughts? |
| + | |||
| + | Edit: Especially since it's already considered a Formula here: http://en.lfsmanual.net/wiki/Cars#Car_Classes - we need some consistency here. :) - Bob | ||
Revision as of 14:02, 18 January 2008
I re-odered the single seater cars list to put the FBM first. Seems better that way? I don't know how to change the template at the bottom of the page to match, though. Also, shouldn't the MRT5 be in here rather than unclassified? It's a single seater alright, and it's a "Formula" (Formula SAE), it only lacks downforce which is not reason to exclude it IMO. Thoughts?
Edit: Especially since it's already considered a Formula here: http://en.lfsmanual.net/wiki/Cars#Car_Classes - we need some consistency here. :) - Bob
